tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37675897.post7845531949759924425..comments2023-12-28T02:11:22.501+00:00Comments on The Streatham & Brixton Chess Blog: Chess CoachTom Chivershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09850710685193416732noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37675897.post-82652602221057182912010-10-11T23:37:53.834+01:002010-10-11T23:37:53.834+01:00That is delightful. :-)That is delightful. :-)Kristahttp://blog.chesshouse.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37675897.post-43173181413352747272010-10-11T15:13:32.684+01:002010-10-11T15:13:32.684+01:00Hmmm: did the *Germans* use algebraic notation in ...Hmmm: did the *Germans* use algebraic notation in 1942? Perhaps the censor was not a bowler-hat-wearing Englishman after all...Omega Amigohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06328222544451249665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37675897.post-23662171930258969512010-10-11T13:52:35.975+01:002010-10-11T13:52:35.975+01:00Actually I'm surprised the Telegraph doesn'...Actually I'm surprised the Telegraph doesn't insist on descriptive to this day.ejhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01582272075999298935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37675897.post-30286853150544642002010-10-11T10:42:51.797+01:002010-10-11T10:42:51.797+01:00Hmmm, back in 1942 I venture to suggest that the c...Hmmm, back in 1942 I venture to suggest that the censor (picture him as a bowler-hat wearing Englishman) would have written "Why not 14.P-K5?".Jon Hnoreply@blogger.com