I am surprised that Stewart has forgotten the actions performed by Anderton after the financial fiasco of the 1986 world championship match: as the classic account reminds us
and according to Mohammed Amin's recollection:
Anderton's long stint as England team captain was unfortunately marred by the controversy surrounding Ray's grandmaster norm at the Nice Olympiad, a fine achievement but one made at the expense of both the team and his colleague William Hartston, who was obliged to ruin his own norm chances by playing, in Michael Stean's words, "a string of difficult games on board one" so that Ray could "rest", i.e. avoid playing at all in case he put his own norm at risk.
Those final rounds at Nice
Curiously the controversy failed to make any appearance in Anderton's report (my low-quality reproduction is from Ray and Dave's book of the tournament)
but the Kingpin piece comments:
Keene and Anderton emerge from this episode equally tainted, as self-serving manipulator and acquiescent accompliceand it continues:
roles they would reprise 11 years later in the Miles affairwhich is probably the controversy for which Anderton is best known.
No need to go through it all again here, but not as often seen as the Kingpin and Sunday Times pieces is the correspondence in CHESS from June and July 1991, involving Anderton, Keene, Miles, the Sunday Times journalist Nick Pitt and some tart editorial comments at the end.
Apologies if it doesn't fit the page, but otherwise it's hard to read. At the time, though, it wasn't that it was hard to read that was the problem, but, as the editorial comments suggest, that it was hard to believe.
A lot of pro bono work, for sure. A lot of freely-given service. All this is to David Anderton's credit and there's a lot of it.
And there's a lot that isn't to his credit, too.
[Ray Keene index]