Private Eye, issue 1348, 6 September 2013.
Naturally we recommend you purchase a copy.
Or you may have seen the recent piece on Chessbase, which has sent several thousand extra page-views our way since it appeared on Monday.
Score at around 2200 BST last night
Should either of these apply, you may be new to the affair of Ray Keene's multiple plagiarism, so let us direct you in the first instance to:
- our Ray Keene Plagiarism Index
- the piece on which the Eye reported in June
- the particular plagiarism on which the Eye reports this week (by coincidence, covered by us yesterday).
The Eye observes:
still his employers at the Times and Spectator do nothing.The Spectator's editor, Fraser Nelson (firstname.lastname@example.org) was emailed on 19 June 2013: so far no response has been forthcoming, in line with what appears to be established practice at that publication.
Nevertheless, yesterday morning I sent Mr Nelson a letter with a full list of all the Spectator chess columns we have found (from the period of his editorship) that have plagiarised other people's work.
The Times were contacted by phone on 23 August, when I spoke to a Craig Tregurtha, who asked me to email both him and a man named Ian Brunskill. I sent them an email with a full list of all the Times chess columns we have found (from 2011 onwards) that have plagiarised other people's work.
I've not yet received a response from either, so yesterday I emailed again.
From: Justin Hortonand attached the relevant page from Private Eye.
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
I wonder if you are yet in a position to respond to my email of 23 August concerning the multiple plagiarisms of your chess correspondent.
Huesca province, Spain
Should I get any response from anybody, I'll let you know. In the mean time, should any readers, new, regular or occasional, wish to email any of the gentlemen concerned, by all means do so.
[Thanks to Sean Terry and Chris Brooke for scans]
[Ray Keene index]